Title: Peer assessment of reflective reports
Course: Learning Design > Section: Learning design models

Conduct a peer assessment of your colleagues’ reflective reports according to the specified criteria.

Evaluate at least one report using the following criteria:

- quality of the analysis of the educational context (all elements are covered)
- justified selection of the learning design model
- comparison of the ABC and BDP digital tools prepared according to the criteria

The instructor also participates in the evaluation of the reports according to the criteria and the attached rubric, in the same manner as the participants. The final grade represents the combined results of the evaluations completed by participants and the instructor.

Assessment form: Kvaliteta analize obrazovnog konteksta (obuhvaćeni su svi elementi).

Assessment form: Obrazloženi izbor dizajna učenja.

Assessment form: Usporedba digitalnih alata ABC i BDP izrađena po kriterijima.

Assessment form: Quality of the educational context analysis (all elements covered)

- An analysis of the educational context was not conducted.
- An educational context analysis has been written, but not all elements are covered or it is incomplete.
- The educational context analysis is written, all elements are included, but there are not enough supporting arguments.
- The analysis of the educational context is thorough and all elements are covered.
Assessment form: A reasoned choice of learning design

- Design is not selected.
- A design was chosen, but the choice was not sufficiently argued.
- A design has been chosen and the choice has been justified.
Assessment form: Comparison of digital tools ABC and BDP made according to the criteria:

Accessibility and ease of use of the tool; Usability of the tool for planning based on learning outcomes and focused on the student; Quality of instructions for use.

- The comparison is not given.
- The comparison is written, but not clearly argued.
- The comparison is written, it is argued, but not all criteria are covered.
- The comparison is written, argued, and includes all criteria.