Activity description:
In this activity, you will examine the capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) tools for generating feedback to students. Using one of the selected tools, you will explore how AI can support formative and/or summative assessment in education. The results and reflections you receive will contribute to your overall understanding of the pedagogical potential of AI tools and systems in education.
Activities:
-
Design a quality prompt that requests feedback.
-
Analyse the tool's response.
-
Write a short review in which you critically reflect on the advantages, limitations, and potential applications of the selected AI tool in an educational setting.
Instructions:
-
Randomly select one AI tool for summative and formative assessment.
-
Design and formulate a prompt that asks the AI tool to evaluate or comment on student work, or to generate formative feedback according to the given evaluation criteria, using a selected example from an educational environment (real or fictional).
-
Enter your prompt into the selected AI tool and record the response received.
-
Prepare a short text description in PDF format (up to 300 words) that includes:
-
The name of the AI tool used (e.g., ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, etc.)
-
The exact prompt you entered into the AI tool
-
A summary of the tool's response – a brief description of the response received
-
Your review of the usefulness of the selected AI tool for the chosen example, for example: Was the output of the AI tool applicable and useful? What are the advantages and disadvantages of the selected AI tool in the educational process based on your personal assessment?
-
A conclusion on the potential of the selected artificial intelligence tool for evaluation in education.
-
-
Save the PDF document and upload it to the Assignment solution submission resource.
Scoring method (up to 7 summative points):
| Criterion | Description | Max points |
|---|---|---|
| Clearly formulated prompt |
2: The prompt is clear, precise, and specific enough for the AI to provide a relevant answer. 1: The prompt is partially clear or imprecise. 0: The prompt is unclear or unusable. |
2 |
| Summary of the tool’s response |
1: The summary is clear, accurate, and reflects the essence of the tool’s response. 0: The summary is unclear, inaccurate, or incomplete. |
1 |
| Critical reflection on usefulness |
3: The reflection is detailed, well-argued, and includes advantages, limitations, and the applicability of the tool. 2: The reflection is partially argued. 1: The reflection is very superficial. 0: The reflection is missing or irrelevant. |
3 |
| Conclusion of the work |
1: The conclusion is clear and summarises the experience of using the tool, including insights about learning and usefulness. 0: The conclusion is missing or not relevant. |
1 |
| Total | — | 7 |
Note:
- After submitting the assignment, the instructor will provide you with feedback and award points in the Loomen system.
Background Colour
Font Face
Font Size
Text Colour
Font Kerning
Image Visibility
Letter Spacing
Line Height
Link Highlight