Watch the video Evaluating Project-Based and Collaborative Work in Online Settings, which explains how to design an evaluation system that is transparent and objective.
IMPORTANT: This activity is mandatory!
Project and collaborative work in online classes represent one of the most powerful forms of active learning. However, evaluating these activities poses significant challenges. How can we determine individual contributions? How do we assess the process, not just the final document or presentation? How can we evaluate an individual within a team while fostering cooperation rather than competition? In this lesson, we guide you in designing an evaluation system that is transparent, fair, and pedagogically effective. We will explore specific tools, rubrics, and procedures to evaluate the product and the collaborative process. Team assignments should not be assessed solely based on the submitted work. It is crucial to evaluate the following three components. First, the final result, did it meet the goals? Was the work of high quality and did it align with the task? Second, the process. How did the team collaborate and how regularly did they meet, communicate and share resources. Third, individual contribution. What did each member contribute and how? By evaluating all three dimensions, we demonstrate to students that we value their work, effort, and shared responsibility. This approach enhances not only their metacognitive and social competence, but also their academic skills. Rubrics are the most effective tool for transparent and fair evaluation of teamwork. A rubric may include criteria such as content, clarity of expression, logical structure, team dynamics, and reflection. For instance, one criterion could be: "All members have clearly contributed to the document or project." Grading with rubrics also allow students to understand expectations beforehand. Additionally, rubrics simplify feedback because you can refer to predefined items rather than starting from scratch. They can also be used for self-evaluation. A common challenge in evaluating teamwork is point distribution. If all team members receive the same score, students may complain that some members did not contribute to the project. If each member is evaluated separately, the essence of team dynamics is lost. Therefore, the most effective approach combines both methods. The majority of the grade is based on joint work, with a smaller part reflecting individual contributions. Peer reviews and logs from collaborative tools can influence this component. This approach sends a clear message. Teamwork is important while acknowledging individual contributions. Evaluating teamwork does not have to be frustrating, provided that you have a clear plan communicated to your students in advance. By combining rubrics and collaboration tools and involving students in the evaluation process, you can create a system that is both fair and motivating. It is important to agree with your students beforehand on the evaluation method, as this builds trust and reduces conflict. Getting started is straightforward. Create your evaluation grid. Define the criteria, and include peer or self-evaluation. Your students will see this as a professional and responsible approach, and you will have a tool that saves time and enhances teaching..
Project and collaborative work in online classes represent one of the most powerful forms of active learning. However, evaluating these activities poses significant challenges. How can we determine individual contributions? How do we assess the process, not just the final document or presentation? How can we evaluate an individual within a team while fostering cooperation rather than competition? In this lesson, we guide you in designing an evaluation system that is transparent, fair, and pedagogically effective. We will explore specific tools, rubrics, and procedures to evaluate the product and the collaborative process. Team assignments should not be assessed solely based on the submitted work. It is crucial to evaluate the following three components. First, the final result, did it meet the goals? Was the work of high quality and did it align with the task? Second, the process. How did the team collaborate and how regularly did they meet, communicate and share resources. Third, individual contribution. What did each member contribute and how? By evaluating all three dimensions, we demonstrate to students that we value their work, effort, and shared responsibility. This approach enhances not only their metacognitive and social competence, but also their academic skills. Rubrics are the most effective tool for transparent and fair evaluation of teamwork. A rubric may include criteria such as content, clarity of expression, logical structure, team dynamics, and reflection. For instance, one criterion could be: "All members have clearly contributed to the document or project." Grading with rubrics also allow students to understand expectations beforehand. Additionally, rubrics simplify feedback because you can refer to predefined items rather than starting from scratch. They can also be used for self-evaluation. A common challenge in evaluating teamwork is point distribution. If all team members receive the same score, students may complain that some members did not contribute to the project. If each member is evaluated separately, the essence of team dynamics is lost. Therefore, the most effective approach combines both methods. The majority of the grade is based on joint work, with a smaller part reflecting individual contributions. Peer reviews and logs from collaborative tools can influence this component. This approach sends a clear message. Teamwork is important while acknowledging individual contributions. Evaluating teamwork does not have to be frustrating, provided that you have a clear plan communicated to your students in advance. By combining rubrics and collaboration tools and involving students in the evaluation process, you can create a system that is both fair and motivating. It is important to agree with your students beforehand on the evaluation method, as this builds trust and reduces conflict. Getting started is straightforward. Create your evaluation grid. Define the criteria, and include peer or self-evaluation. Your students will see this as a professional and responsible approach, and you will have a tool that saves time and enhances teaching..
Background Colour
Font Face
Font Size
Text Colour
Font Kerning
Image Visibility
Letter Spacing
Line Height
Link Highlight